Cricket WC 2011: India's old problems resurface

Filed under: Sports by Hari
Posted at 09:56 IST (last updated: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 @ 09:58 IST)
Cricket World Cup 2011After India's loss to South Africa in the Group B game on Saturday, I think the same old problems of Indian cricket resurface yet again. I don't think much needs to be said, but I'll just highlight some here.
  • In almost a couple of decades now, India have struggled to find a genuine all-rounder to replace Kapil Dev. Sorry, but without one, the Indian team management will always find it tough to find the right balance going into any match whether we play 6 or 7 batsmen.
  • A lower order that cannot hold a bat. The Indian tail has never been renowned for wagging and we still carry single-talent cricketers whose failure to perform in their own specialization can cost us matches. Case in point: Munaf Patel and Ashish Nehra.
  • Still no fast bowler who can rattle the stumps at will in the latter half of the innings. Almost every Test playing nation has a genuine pacer these days. India still struggle to find one.
  • Sub-par fielding unit which has shown no signs of improvement in decades, except a few odd sparks of brilliance on occasion. Enough said.

Every single problem listed above gets exposed in big games against the tougher opponents so I don't really have high expectations of India making it big in a tournament like the World Cup. Dhoni's captaincy is another issue meriting its own separate analysis. If India make it past the quarter-final stage, it is an achievement of sorts.

1 comment(s)

Leave a comment »
  1. Hey, South Africa has a great team for the next season...better get your pads on and start practicing!

    Comment by crazyzoar (visitor) on Wed, 1 Jun 2011 @ 22:39 IST #

Leave a comment

First-time comments on this blog are moderated.
Your name*
Email ID*
(wont' be published)
Website
Your comments*
(No HTML allowed)
:-) :-D :biggrin: :-P ;-) 8-) :-( :mad: |-| :oops: :-/ :-| :roll:
bold italic quote code
Code* captcha Enter the code you see in the image
* required fields