Humour, comics, tech, law, software, reviews, essays, articles and HOWTOs intermingled with random philosophy now and then
Filed under:
Software and Technology by
Hari
Posted on Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 17:44 IST (last updated: Tue, Jul 21, 2009 @ 21:35 IST)
This looks more like a public service announcement, but is actually a rant against external USB hard drives.
I was taking my usual backup of personal files and data when I noticed that I was unable to copy or delete files halfway through the process. After several frustrated attempts, I realized that the drive was emitted a faint, but perceptible clicking noise. Not an encouraging sign by any means. Even trusted and well-known brands (like Seagate) are bound to fail, as I learned today.
Quite a lot of important data is stored on this hard disk and unfortunately there is no secondary backup for much of the data. As it is a fairly new hard disk bought just a few months ago, I hardly expected it to give me any problems. However, I learned a hard but valuable lesson today: never trust USB hard drives as a reliable backup option.
Even as I write this I'm trying my best to copy some of the data, but I've already encountered numerous I/O failures.
Luckily, in my case, most, if not all of these files can be retrieved in one form or another but will require a bit of work collecting the files from different locations. However, it has led me to think: what IS a safe backup medium in this day and age?
Let me evaluate some of the common options for offline backup (as opposed to data redundancy options like RAID):
- Hard drives are bound to fail. Period. External ones seem especially susceptible to sudden failures. Internal hard drives aren't an option for archival purposes for obvious reasons.
Bottom line: Hard disks are a very bad option, but are most convenient for storage of large files.
- Optical media like CD-Rs and DVD+-Rs are notoriously susceptible to scratches and loss of reflectivity over a period of time. While optical media theoritically seems a safer bet than relying on a fragile magnetic disk, I've known them to fail on numerous occasions and had very little success in actually retrieving data from a bad optical medium.
Bottom line: Reasonable solution, but inconvenient for bulky data running into several gigabytes and incremental backups are well-nigh impossible, requiring fresh media for every backup.
- USB flash drives are known to fail and are, moreover aren't exactly large in size and cannot accommodate huge archives of audio and video files (as in my case).
Bottom line: Not enough capacity and is not an archival quality option. Good in an emergency though.
- Tape drives are practically unknown for home users. I'm not sure how many organizations continue to use tape archival for their backup purposes but I don't see it as a viable alternative for home users at any time.
Bottom line: Inconvenient for home users, but seems to be practically the most reliable, tried and tested backup technology currently available in the market.
- Other backup media are either specialized and are not easily accessible for desktop end users. Online backup is impractical even with high-speed internet connections and carries some obvious privacy and security risks, while local network backups require some kind of quality archival media already in place.
Any ideas on which backup device that a home user with considerable audio and video data (running to around 40-50 GB and moreover, not being downloaded music or movies, are far more valuable and irreplaceable) can use as a failsafe option under these conditions? I haven't a clue so far. Tape drives seem the most preferable solution, yet they are expensive and not easily available in the market, typically bulkier and require more physical storage space than hard drives or CD-ROM stacks for far less data capacity.
The real issue here is that hard drives are getting bigger in capacity and less reliable in terms of performance and stability. In my own experience, not one single brand or manufacturer inspires confidence for long-term reliability. If the reliability issue could be dealt with, there's no questioning the sheer convenience of a hard disk data store.
One would have thought that in this day and age, we could have devised at least one truly fail safe, reasonably inexpensive and convenient medium for permanent data archival.
23 comment(s)
Shoot me for even suggesting it.
My files are held together by prayer.
Comment by Dion moult (visitor) on Tue, Jul 21, 2009 @ 21:19 IST #
Besides, what I really want is a solid offline backup mechanism which gives me peace of mind.
That's the last and final strategy
Comment by Hari (blog owner) on Tue, Jul 21, 2009 @ 21:27 IST #
Comment by titanium (visitor) on Wed, Jul 22, 2009 @ 08:55 IST #
Right now I'm backing up the huge archive of audio data into DVD-Rs for peace of mind. That's the most important of the lot and represents literally hundreds of man hours of work of conversion from cassette tapes...
Comment by Hari (blog owner) on Wed, Jul 22, 2009 @ 09:03 IST #
Comment by Shrinidhi Hande (visitor) on Wed, Jul 22, 2009 @ 10:37 IST #
Of course, DVD-Rs can always be used, but these days the laptop DVD drives (especially Slimtype drives) are more error-prone and not all DVDs tend to work on older systems. There are some issues with DVDs that render them less than useful for archival purposes.
Good old CD-Rs are much more reliable and less error-prone but are far too small in capacity for audio and video data running to so many Gigabytes.
Comment by Hari (blog owner) on Wed, Jul 22, 2009 @ 10:57 IST #
1. Work related documents: Keep them on a DVD and protect. Take backup whenever you need. Lose these, you're effed!
2. Photos: You can of course upload the important ones to FlickR and stuff
3. Music and movies: Share with your friends, so you always have a backup. My 110 GB music collection is in three places, so unless there's a ebomb going off somewhere, things are pretty safe
4. Get a really good spikeguard. Trust me. It helps and prevents screw-ups in power fluctuation, which is the main cause of hard disks screwing up.
5. Keep your HDD cool. Once I tried copying 500 GB of data and the room was warm. The HDD gor fried but thankfully was replaced under warranty. Under prolonged periods of copying, ensure it's under a fan on in an AC room.
Comment by Chuck (visitor) on Wed, Jul 22, 2009 @ 12:40 IST #
However, there are many reasons why I don't give away my documents to friends or others and I feel more comfortable making private backups.
Also I agree with you. Hard disk are the MOST convenient back up mechanism at present. However, exernal USB hard drives seem far more susceptible to mechanical and electrical problems than internal drives, which usually last quite long and work well. Also increasing capacity of drives seems to be a big issue.
Heat can be a problem, but luckily I use a fan directly blowing at the computer, so it doesn't usually get so heated up as to cause problems.
Actually it wouldn't have helped in my case. The external drive was self-powered and connected to my laptop, which is protected in any case by its own adaptor from overloads etc. In the main desktop system I use a UPS backup, so again, there's no real danger of spike problems.
Comment by Hari (blog owner) on Wed, Jul 22, 2009 @ 13:00 IST #
Comment by tjpike (visitor) on Fri, Jul 24, 2009 @ 07:44 IST #
Comment by Hari (blog owner) on Fri, Jul 24, 2009 @ 08:26 IST #
I recently bought an Ovations RFID security case in which to house my old notebook HD. I haven't pulled it from the notebook yet, but I plan do so soon. Since it's designed as a backup solution, it doesn't have anything extra. The case is barely large enough to hold the 2 1/2 inch drive itself (one end of the case plugs directly into the drive). There is only the tiny, odd-shaped USB port like you find with camcorders and PSPs to contend with. I think it cost me $10.00.
Anyway, the point is that you can use an external HD as a backup, but not the kind they offer right off the shelf with an HD included. Those do not last unless you rarely turn them on.
Comment by RT Cunningham (visitor) on Sun, Jul 26, 2009 @ 20:59 IST #
By the way, if your case clicks you can probably still use the drive. If it has a protected partition, you'll have to re-partition and reformat it. The circuit board in the case is usually at fault.
Comment by RT Cunningham (visitor) on Sun, Jul 26, 2009 @ 21:03 IST #
By the way, do self-powered USB drives fail more often? Mine was a self-powered USB HDD and didn't use any external power supply.
As for drive partitioning, I did it myself. I actually used created ext3 partitions on the drive of around 147 GiB each (total actual capacity close to 297 GiB though advertised as "320 G", because I use Linux.
But the clicking noise definitely seems more of a real physical problem with the drive actually.
Luckily redundancy has saved the day for me and nothing on that drive is lost.
Comment by Hari (blog owner) on Sun, Jul 26, 2009 @ 21:37 IST #
Both of mine had external power, so I don't think where the power comes from has anything to do with it.
Comment by RT Cunningham (visitor) on Mon, Jul 27, 2009 @ 15:53 IST #
So I am going to give it back to the manufacturer as I will get a free replacement most likely as he said that he would replace it if he found any fault/defect. If he sees any sign that I have meddled physically with it, he will definitely not replace it.
Also I will no longer use the USB hard disk as a prime backup. It will be a secondary back up.
Comment by Hari (blog owner) on Mon, Jul 27, 2009 @ 16:48 IST #
I dealt with a hard drive crash before. It was an internal 2.5" drive, though, and I ended up shelling out $700 to save 2 years of work and media: I didn't used to back up.
I usually use an external drive for *backup* only -- that is, if my external drive crashes I still have all my data on my computer. I don't have enough media that I need an external drive.
In your case why not use two disks in a Raid 5 or Raid 1 configuration? I think the price isn't that high nowadays and you can even scale up as your needs go up.
Comment by Armchair Guy (visitor) on Sat, Aug 1, 2009 @ 23:05 IST #
Since I am using a laptop primarily and cannot change the hardware, I am not sure how I can use a RAID 5 or RAID 1 configuration. If I ever use a desktop system again, I will definitely think of using RAID.
Comment by Hari (blog owner) on Sun, Aug 2, 2009 @ 08:47 IST #
I meant an external, USB-connected Raid enclosure. You get raid enclosures these days with up to 4 bays for hard drives.
Of course a simple solution is to take an image of your first USB disk onto a second USB disk for extra protection...
Comment by Armchair Guy (visitor) on Sun, Aug 2, 2009 @ 19:37 IST #
That's what I had actually. A second backup (in another internal hard disk though). Redundancy is the key, whether it's RAID-type setup or simply another device.
Comment by Hari (blog owner) on Sun, Aug 2, 2009 @ 20:50 IST #
For Pre-Vista Computers
XCOPY use to be the tool of choice, but when encountering path and file names greater than 255 characters, XCOPY will generate an out of memory error and exit. If you are using a Windows XP or 2003 Server computer, ROBOCOPY can be downloaded from Microsoft in the “Windows Server 2003 Resource Kit Tools” located at:
http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=17657
Once you have downloaded and installed the resource kit tools, search for “ROBOCOPY*.*” and copy it to “C:\Windows\System32”. This will make the program available anywhere.
Creating the Backup Script
On the backup drive, we will create a one line batch file that contains the backup command. This batch file should be located on the backup drive. We want it here so that no matter what letter the drive is assigned, the backups will run.
Using “Note Pad”, we will create a file called “Backup.BAT” and save it to your backup drive. The file should contain the following command:
ROBOCOPY c:\ .\Backup\ /e /w:1 /r:1
This will back up the whole hard drive to a folder called “Backup” where ever the “Backup.BAT” file is located: on the backup drive.
How it Works
ROBOCOPY will only copy the changed files, skipping a majority of the files that have not changed. If a file is in use or cannot be copied, ROBOCOPY will nicely skip the file and move on. This ensures that the backup will be completed to the best of the computer’s ability.
If you have Outlook or QuickBooks on your computer, you will want to make sure that those programs are closed before doing a back. If you leave these programs open, the backup will skip their important data files.
Shawn Zernik
Internetwork Consulting
Comment by shawn z (visitor) on Wed, Aug 3, 2011 @ 00:04 IST #
Comment by data recovery program (visitor) on Wed, Nov 14, 2012 @ 07:10 IST #
These can range from the 2 bay diskless at $150 to the 8 bay high end at $1500.
I like the diskless ones because you can buy the size disk you want to use and expand as you need. A 4 bay enclosure with Raid 1 and 4 Terabyte drives can give you 8 Terabyte of raid redundant storage.
The trick with these is to recycle the hard drives years by pulling a drive out and replacing it. It will force data to be rewritten to the drives and make sure it is still readible and refreshed. If I have a 4 bay drive I would replace one drive every 4 years. The other trick is to find raided enclosures that spin down the drive when not in use. This will help the hard drive to last much longer than ones that are continually spinning.
Comment by Todd (visitor) on Sat, May 11, 2013 @ 22:11 IST #
Comment by Hari (blog owner) on Sun, May 12, 2013 @ 07:39 IST #