Pros and cons of using a vector drawing package

Filed under: Software and Technology by Hari
Posted at 23:10 IST (last updated: 29 Dec 2009 @ 23:17 IST)
One of the things I've attempted recently is to switch from a raster-based image manipulation program to a vector drawing software to create my comics. Based on my own experience of using Inkscape, as opposed to the GIMP, I have compiled a short list of pros and cons of both approaches.

Obviously I am no guru at using any of these tools and I'm no expert artist either, so many of these points may not apply to the power users. Nevertheless, for what they're worth, I thought I'd share my thoughts on them.

First the pros:
  • Extremely flexible drawing ability. Modifying line thickness is a breeze, as is adjusting contours and shapes. Small corrections which would involve considerably painful pixel manipulation in a raster tool can be achieved with ease in an vector drawing tool.
  • A variety of pre-built shapes available (including stars and regular polygons).
  • The ability to edit a picture does not diminish after saving and reloading a file from disk.
  • The option of exporting the drawing as a bitmap at whatever resolution/DPI you wish without loss of quality. This makes it a great option to use as a source for both online and print publishing (printing requires a much higher DPI count for quality.)
  • Finally makes it much easier to draw without an external pen/tablet as curves can be smoothened automatically at whatever level you wish. As a result, lines look much smoother than lines drawn in a raster image editor.

Now, the cons:
  • Detailing the image requires more vector objects, adding complexity to the existing drawing and making it much more cumbersome to edit.
  • Use of layering can be awkward and not always obvious. This might be specific to Inkscape, I suspect, but because of the complex relationship between objects which already have an existing Z-order, layer management is a tad cumbersome.
  • Adding effects like gradients require more thought. Also it's not trivial (though possible) to add realistic shading, lighting and other special effects to a vector drawing.
  • Too much flexibility in editing can actually turn out to be a drawback as you can keep on tweaking a picture to achieve perfection losing productivity in the process.
  • Last but not least, the sheer enjoyment and fulfillment of drawing naturally will be missed.

I personally think that the pros outweigh the cons. In the final analysis I believe in using whatever tools do the job well and if that involves using both, I would gladly do it (I already post-process an Inkscape-exported bitmap to add shading using the GIMP)

2 comment(s)

Leave a comment »
  1. I don't do much graphics nowadays but for most editing when I do deal with graphics, I'm usually fine with The Gimp.

    Comment by drew (visitor) on 30 Dec 2009 @ 13:03 IST #
  2. Drew, GIMP is fine for detailed, photographic type images and for post-processing and special effects work, but for sketching/drawing and basic colouring I think vector graphics tools have a distinct advantage.

    The debate of vector vs raster graphics is probably as old as emacs vs vi.

    Comment by Hari (blog owner) on 30 Dec 2009 @ 14:26 IST #

Leave a comment

First-time comments on this blog are moderated.
Your name*
Email ID*
(wont' be published)
Website
Your comments*
(No HTML allowed)
:-) :-D :biggrin: :-P ;-) 8-) :-( :mad: |-| :oops: :-/ :-| :roll:
bold italic quote code
Code* captcha Enter the code you see in the image
* required fields