Hari's Corner

Humour, comics, tech, law, software, reviews, essays, articles and HOWTOs intermingled with random philosophy now and then

Amateur art and creative expression

Filed under: Life and Leisure by Hari
Posted on Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:10 IST (last updated: Sun, Jan 25, 2015 @ 11:36 IST)

In this series < Previous

As children we simply used to take a pen and a piece of paper and scribble on it, deriving pleasure in seeing coloured lines and shapes fill up a blank piece of paper. We used to write childish stories with uninhibited confidence and innocence, blissfully ignorant of literary techniques, character development, rules of story-telling and so on. Yet, it was an immensely fun process. A growing knowledge of realism and the world around us filled us with increasing inhibitions in expressing ideas. As we grew up, we became stiff and stopped expressing our creativity because it seemed silly and meaningless to pursue something without mastering the basics and fundamentals of that art form. So we simply abandon creativity because we fear ridicule and criticism when all we want to do is to simply have fun in our free time.

The more I think about it, the more I feel that the techniques and workflow of professional artists need not be a base-line for amateurs. Amateur artwork should not be subject to the same level of scrutiny and criticism as professional work. By amateurs, I basically mean people who simply enjoy art for relaxation and pleasure and find some enjoyment in getting better over a period of time and not necessarily feel the urge to compete or compare themselves with professionals who've been at it for decades.

Too often, art advise received on the internet is impractical to follow for somebody who is employed full-time in another profession and simply has an hour or two to spare on weekends for pursuing hobbies. For example in the field of drawing and painting, many traditional artists insist on using real live models as references instead of photographs. There is an insistence on formal art training. An insistence on drawing from real life. Things like maintaining a sketch book to carry around everywhere one goes and practise gesture drawing on a daily basis. Apart from this, there is an emphasis on technique and skill development in a formalized manner - learning of concepts such as perspective, proportion and construction. Then of course, there is the question of mastery over traditional media which is a topic in itself. In spite of the advances of digital art and techniques, there are too many people who continue to scoff at any work of art produced with the aid of a computer, regardless of the effort put in by the artist.

Now I am not saying that the traditionalists are wrong. Of course, mastery of any form of art requires a huge investment in time and effort. The question is whether amateurs really want to master art to  the level that a professional whose livelihood depends on it. Basics are important for sure, but for pure enjoyment and pleasure of creative expression, does an amateur have to go through the rigorous and often boring process of formal training? Does it matter to an amateur who simply wants to draw some (unrealistic) comic-like figures to have to go through an intensive study of human anatomy? Of course, professionals will say that unless you master the basics, your proportions and shapes will always be wrong and that even to break the rules of art, you first need to master the rules. But then, is that the point? What purpose is served in discouraging an amateur/hobbyist from expressing his creativity simply because his proportions are off and his drawings are unrealistic? Too often, the purpose of the creator is forgotten in all this.

If the purpose of my art is simply to enjoy the process of creativity and express myself, what does it matter if I have no formal art training and that my fundamentals are all wrong? Does it really matter if I choose to focus on digital/non-traditional instead of traditional media? Does it matter if I choose to ignore the tedious, long and boring process of art studies and simply go on to express an idea or a topic in the form and manner I choose? Is the professionals' problem that I dare to label  my piece of creative expression "art"? Is " art" somehow sullied or degraded if amateur artists choose to express their creativity and then publish it on the internet? Is a hobbyist really looking to become an accomplished artist or simply using art as a means of recreation and relaxation? I believe there is no point in giving artistic advice to an amateur artist who simply wants to have fun with it. Suggesting  an artistic process that is a tedious grind and a formal learning experience to somebody who neither has the time nor inclination for it is a pointless and futile exercise. Unsolicited art advice simply discourages and kills creativity. And it can deprive somebody of the simple pleasure of making an idea come to life, however imperfectly or weakly.

In this series

2 comment(s)

  1. +1.

    Do stuff that you enjoy, and if you enjoy it, you&#039;ll do more of it. If you do more of it, you&#039;ll probably get better at it. Going at the pace you enjoy as opposed to a tedious grind is absolutely no problem if you have the time for it. (ie. don&#039;t need to immediately make a profession out of it)

    Keep on posting your artwork! Although I don&#039;t have the time to regularly comment I do enjoy looking at them!

    Aside: It&#039;s a bit strange how visual art is different from music. I feel as though amateur music has a lot more of a chance than amateur art.

    Comment by Dion Moult (visitor) on Mon, Feb 2, 2015 @ 07:20 IST #
  2. Hi Dion,

    Yes absolutely. I also enjoy composing short instrumental music using Open Source tools and MIDI, though of late I've not created any pieces.

    I am now at that level when I can tell how good or bad I am. I understand my limitations as well. Unfortunately a lot of beginning artists find it daunting to take criticism and give up rather early than simply enjoying art for art's sake. Too many "art" critics (especially online) tend to evaluate everything at a very technical level and impose standards that even some professional artists cannot regularly live up to in their work.

    In fact, I would suspect that a lot of professional artists simply develop their own standards and stick by them without paying much attention to critics. So long as your customer/client is happy, what else matters? Laypersons are the best judges of art, because the bulk of your customers/clients would be the non-artistic population out there, not fellow professionals.

    Comment by Hari (blog owner) on Mon, Feb 2, 2015 @ 07:34 IST #

Comments closed

The blog owner has closed further commenting on this entry.