This might sound oddly counter-intuitive, but I find many of the "success" stories out there in the market of people who've made it big, strangely uninspiring. I'm not going to get into a long and philosophical debate on the topic but I have some practical reasons why success stories are almost always useless as "inspiration" material, whether in a material or spiritual sense. Not that I've read too many of them, but even the few I've read over the years seem to be enough.
In the first place, I put (auto-)biographical success stories into two broad categories: One is the "Oh-I-was-born-as-an-orphan-everything-against-me-sold-newspapers-as-a-kid-made-it-big-through-sheer-hard-work" kind. Put simply, a rags-to-riches kind of story emphasizing on how the person who achieved the success had everything against him or her from their childhood and how, through sheer hard work and persistence, and in the face of big odds, they made it big in life. The second is the "I-worked-smart-throughout-my-life-and-have-a-secret-to-share-with-you" kind. I will come back to the second type later on. First I will take a good look the first type.
I find these "against-all-odds" stories annoying at two levels. From a purely rationalistic viewpoint, while most of us weren't born with silver spoons, neither were we born into broken families or abandoned as kids in a hostile environment and made to battle for our daily bread. Thus, the identification with the main character is switched off right at the start, at least in those stories where the character isn't from a middle-class family background. Secondly, analysing the effort-reward ratio can be demotivating as well. What! You spent three-fourths of your life struggling and fighting to achieve that level of success finally at an age when you are probably concerned about the quantity of sugar in your coffee (if you drink coffee at all that is!) Wouldn't you rather spend a lot more time at the prime of your life leading life a little more calmly and achieving a fraction of that success? From a spiritualistic point of view, those of us who are of a fatalistic kind probably wouldn't believe that success was entirely due to that hard work alone. Call it dumb luck, opportunity knocking at the right time, right contacts, being at the right place at the right time, or if you are of the more religious kind, divine intervention, there is always some "turning point" in the life of these ultra-successful people (however well deserved their success might be) that seems to evade the rest of us no matter how hard we work. Yes, go back and read those success biographies again.
The second type of "work-smart-secret-to-success" are a bit better from a practical point of view, but again fail to deliver specifics. Most of the advice given in such books are of a very generic and unsatisfactory nature. Practical, real-world tips are rare; and if they do work at all, they might work in a particular cultural context only (notice that most of these success stories are by American or first-world authors who make large assumptions about the role and recognition of merit in society, and the underlying base of free-market capitalism that makes it possible). Then again, putting many of these "practical" tips to use so consistently and correctly in the real world is a different story altogether.
I find that reading about the success of really big people is not a solution to the real world, practical problems and issues faced by the large majority of people in the world trying to lead ordinary lives with moderate success and happiness. What is required is a scientific and practical study of an average middle-class man or woman, who goes through life leading a steady, suitable career path without too many dramatic ups or downs, achieving reasonable success, accumulating a little wealth for a rainy day; AND has the time for ordinary pleasures and happiness within a family structure. Nothing in these extraordinary success stories gives us a clue about realistic dreams and leading a balanced life in terms of our own economic, social and cultural background. Hari's Corner
Humour, comics, tech, law, software, reviews, essays, articles and HOWTOs intermingled with random philosophy now and thenWhy I never liked "success stories"
Filed under:
People and society by
Hari
Posted on Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 20:58 IST (last updated: Sat, Sep 10, 2011 @ 20:58 IST)
This might sound oddly counter-intuitive, but I find many of the "success" stories out there in the market of people who've made it big, strangely uninspiring. I'm not going to get into a long and philosophical debate on the topic but I have some practical reasons why success stories are almost always useless as "inspiration" material, whether in a material or spiritual sense. Not that I've read too many of them, but even the few I've read over the years seem to be enough.
In the first place, I put (auto-)biographical success stories into two broad categories: One is the "Oh-I-was-born-as-an-orphan-everything-against-me-sold-newspapers-as-a-kid-made-it-big-through-sheer-hard-work" kind. Put simply, a rags-to-riches kind of story emphasizing on how the person who achieved the success had everything against him or her from their childhood and how, through sheer hard work and persistence, and in the face of big odds, they made it big in life. The second is the "I-worked-smart-throughout-my-life-and-have-a-secret-to-share-with-you" kind. I will come back to the second type later on. First I will take a good look the first type.
I find these "against-all-odds" stories annoying at two levels. From a purely rationalistic viewpoint, while most of us weren't born with silver spoons, neither were we born into broken families or abandoned as kids in a hostile environment and made to battle for our daily bread. Thus, the identification with the main character is switched off right at the start, at least in those stories where the character isn't from a middle-class family background. Secondly, analysing the effort-reward ratio can be demotivating as well. What! You spent three-fourths of your life struggling and fighting to achieve that level of success finally at an age when you are probably concerned about the quantity of sugar in your coffee (if you drink coffee at all that is!) Wouldn't you rather spend a lot more time at the prime of your life leading life a little more calmly and achieving a fraction of that success? From a spiritualistic point of view, those of us who are of a fatalistic kind probably wouldn't believe that success was entirely due to that hard work alone. Call it dumb luck, opportunity knocking at the right time, right contacts, being at the right place at the right time, or if you are of the more religious kind, divine intervention, there is always some "turning point" in the life of these ultra-successful people (however well deserved their success might be) that seems to evade the rest of us no matter how hard we work. Yes, go back and read those success biographies again.
The second type of "work-smart-secret-to-success" are a bit better from a practical point of view, but again fail to deliver specifics. Most of the advice given in such books are of a very generic and unsatisfactory nature. Practical, real-world tips are rare; and if they do work at all, they might work in a particular cultural context only (notice that most of these success stories are by American or first-world authors who make large assumptions about the role and recognition of merit in society, and the underlying base of free-market capitalism that makes it possible). Then again, putting many of these "practical" tips to use so consistently and correctly in the real world is a different story altogether.
I find that reading about the success of really big people is not a solution to the real world, practical problems and issues faced by the large majority of people in the world trying to lead ordinary lives with moderate success and happiness. What is required is a scientific and practical study of an average middle-class man or woman, who goes through life leading a steady, suitable career path without too many dramatic ups or downs, achieving reasonable success, accumulating a little wealth for a rainy day; AND has the time for ordinary pleasures and happiness within a family structure. Nothing in these extraordinary success stories gives us a clue about realistic dreams and leading a balanced life in terms of our own economic, social and cultural background. New (and stricter) comment policy
Filed under:
Site management by
Hari
Posted on Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 13:18 IST (last updated: Sun, Sep 4, 2011 @ 13:21 IST)
- All comments from sources without a proper human-readable name affixed to them will be deleted.
- Comments bearing descriptive names like the name of websites or products will be deleted without even scanning the content of the comment.
- Generic comments on old posts will not be approved and displayed on this blog.
Two methods of learning in the legal profession
Filed under:
People and society by
Hari
Posted on Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 20:20 IST (last updated: Wed, Aug 17, 2011 @ 20:49 IST)
dvd2mp4rip - A simple interactive DVD rip/video encoding utility
Filed under:
My software by
Hari
Posted on Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:58 IST (last updated: Wed, Jul 27, 2011 @ 11:08 IST)
Getting organized quickly - a guide to real-world files
Filed under:
Life and Leisure by
Hari
Posted on Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:46 IST (last updated: Sun, Jul 10, 2011 @ 18:47 IST)
- Education-related papers: your original degrees, certificates, mark statements, achievements, recognitions and so on.
- Career-related papers: relating to your career; for example, appointment letters, resignation acceptance letters from employers, insurance policies, conduct certificates and so on. Note that this category excludes WORK-related documents. Work-related stuff should never get mixed up with your personal documents.
- Bank and credit card related papers: your bank account details, forms, pass-books, correspondence with and other information from your bank, credit card related papers and so on, but not including regular bank or credit card statements.
- Property-related documents: for instance, original land or house documents, documents relating to vehicles you own etc.
- Bills and other statements: for instance, bank statements, credit card statements, mobile phone or land-line usage bills, bills relating to any other service you use frequently.
- Other important documents: any other important or permanent one-time original records; for instance: birth certificate, original driving license, original identity cards, Government or local authority-related papers.
My allergy to official forms and papers
Filed under:
People and society by
Hari
Posted on Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 18:29 IST (last updated: Wed, Jun 22, 2011 @ 18:34 IST)
Over the last few weeks, I've been busy as I finally passed out of Law College and now the proud holder of a B.L. degree (that's Bachelor of Laws). But as they say, with great power comes great... paperwork. In recent weeks have had to deal with a lot of official forms, since I have to get enrolled with the Bar Council to practise as an Advocate. Of course, official forms mean spending anywhere between a few minutes and a few hours and they vary in content and difficulty (in filling up efficiently).
Without going into specific details, I have to say that one of the reasons I hate official forms is that they contain so many fields and a bit of information to be collected beforehand, not all of it obvious. Forms with a lot of fields require careful perusal before filling up. You have to concentrate. Mistakes can easily be made in a casual moment. There is also the question of passport sized or profile photographs to be pasted and some forms are finicky about the details, which might mean a visit to the neighbouring photographic studio. Then again, forms require different types of additional documents to be annexed and this means spending time and energy in collecting original documents, taking photocopies and in some cases getting them attested. While many original documents can be easily copied on a home copier, some are unwieldy and large and require to be taken to a stationer's for copying.
The problem doesn't end there. Government forms often require payment of some money to a certain statutory authority and this means going to a bank and getting a D.D. (demand draft) issued in favour of the authority or going and depositing money directly in their account with a deposit slip (a.k.a challan).
Add to all this the ambiguity or complexity you find in so many forms along with lack of proper spacing to fill up certain fields, you can see how filling up official forms can get really frustrating. By the time you're done with a form or a series of forms, it will be a kind of triumph to submit them successfully at the office of the appropriate authority. Then comes the usual official delays and so on, but that's another story.
I am hoping that the future of official correspondence and official form submissions, especially in developing nations will become paperless and a lot more convenient, but I'm not holding my breath. The system as it works now is sustained by paperwork, paperwork and more paperwork, along with a load of supporting documents, most of them originally on paper. Converting this to a suitable electronic system will take a whole lot of concerted administrative effort and shedding a lot of red tape. Governments are notoriously slow. Maybe our grandchildren can dream.